in the methodology
not the issue itself
Eye-tracking, brain imaging, measures imported from L1 psychology and psycholinguistsics, and new L2 measures, e.g., of language aptitude, that take into account the last 40 years of research findings in SLA and cognitive science.
eye-tracking and negative feedback
whether it is ok to use implicit feedback instead of explict feedback
if implicit is ok, it mean the lesson can foucus on the content and task , u do have not have to works on lingusitc forms all the time .which is a big interuption
communicative language teaching
task based language teaching
u want to show implicit education is ok, then u do not need to stop the class to do the correction all the time.
methodological innovation starts in US
sensentive to implicit teaching.
could not it be looking at language data , underestimate the impact of corrective feedback..
marry come to school
marry came to school
by the use of eye tracking
notice that learners noticed the recast.
the research issue is the same.
the innovation the methodology used to investigate the issue get us new results.
the way they are investigating...
(age) 30 percent ....
the most powerful predictor varibale in SLA
Second : ;anguage aptitude ;natural ability+part of environment
the problem is
the traditional test we use to measure are ... (40 years ago)
which people are better predictor to learner a proferssional level
who releveant people to train?
new measure reflect last ...
the initial results...........
which people have better chance of to reach profession